The Definitive Guide to imr 4350 vs h4350

So in the total 1350fps HS shell load, 300-mp is kind of a better choice Together with the each individual so marginally slower burn off fee to present a number of additional fps inside the load, even though while in the CF hulls at 1200fps, far better off Together with the 296/H110 which includes The marginally quicker burn charge to maintain the powder burning a contact cleaner rather.



What I would like to be aware of is underneath what ailments the force spikes were seen. Was it since the plastic 410 wads grew to become tough through the cold? Has anybody tried using it during the Hornet starting up with 2400 data?

Only trouble with not reaming the shot bushing to toss 226 of shot inside a HS hull with .296" powder bushing, is definitely the shot will probably rattle within the shell (my Edition of the observe only load When the shot rattles once you shake the spherical).

Dano523 said: Only problem with not reaming the shot bushing to toss 226 of shot in the HS hull with .296" powder bushing, will be the shot will probably rattle while in the shell (my version of the apply only load If your shot rattles any time you shake the round). Click on to broaden...

Like all universal loading formulas some load combos is going to be a rather reduced load Considering that the universal cost is calculated on The premise learn this here now of The mix of components that will provide the highest strain amount.

If this is your initially stop by, be sure you look into the FAQ by clicking the website link higher than. You could have to sign up before you decide to can post: click the register backlink previously mentioned to continue.




this is kinda "Highly developed reloading 101" and can be done when you have a grasp of What's going on originally amount.

all powder will melt away up hulls but with these a few I can get site 6 to 10 reloads without a problem. According to the hull selection there is sufficient tested load data on this site for these powders. Just research it out you won't be dissatisfied.

Now However, if the hulls are HS, then the powder bushing you need should have an ID of .296" along with a focus on weight drop of 16.9grs, which need to set the shell around 1325fps, and that will pattern a hell of whole lot much better than one at 1200fps isntead.

0   Reply This really is an older thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Be sure to think about making a new thread.

Supposedly the burn off price is slightly more rapidly than 2400 but, In the event the maker would not advocate it, I wouldn't get it done. I am explained to that Alliant 410 is usually delicate to reduced temps.

Built by showin




Each bottle of Alliant Smokeless Powder is certain by a century of manufacturing knowledge as well as the industry’s most stringent high quality control procedures. To maintain uniformity, the chemical composition, grain condition and measurement, and General density are constantly verified and evaluated in a very ballistics lab.

I'm able to validate from initially hand experience that the 13gr. load operates just like a appeal by using a load of three @ 0.395" balls; my loads were plastic shells but I see no purpose why it wouldn't perform with total size metallic shells.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *